roderm (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

its not that fact it blows air its that fact it can direct it and turn thats the hard part.All other "primitive" versions can not turn.Thats the revolution that no other could solve

bigrrt12 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

raise your hand if youtube is the greatest site in the world.............. wait a minute that was pointless i cant see your hands.i want a jet pack

bigrrt12 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Holy Schnikey i want one of those damn things maybe i could save up over 100,000 dolllars

theoriginalJASONXYZ (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

looks fun

kondordv (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

if this is so amazing for you, what about the one used by Michael Jackson at one of concert for leaving the scene, right above the people? Anyway, blowing the air with power to lift 100kg it's a shit of new technology by me knowledge, the helicopters are for a long long time doing the same thing. For this years we have to use something else for fly not a "primitive" blowing air. I used again the word primitive, sorry but this is the reality, It is primitive.

MountainDeW06 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Dude I just read an article describing the work put into this craft and it is far from primitive. There is tons of new technology stuffed into this machine and it took this man over 27 years to acchive this "primitive" pinnacle of his achievement. If you think about it, this is the first "jet" pack that can stay in the air longer than 33 seconds and it might stay up as long as 30 minutes. Now that sounds fun to me and if I had 100,100 I would want one and If you weren't a pansy you might too.

DierNagol (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Could you maybe fit primitive one more time in your comment?

kondordv (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

For me it looks like something primitive, too much power and fuel consumption for too few weight rising up against the gravity. This is a primitive technology. People, wakeup and invent new things with much more power, less more energy consumption, and why not noiseless. For me this invention looks primitive for 2000's years.

MARSICCHIA (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

What a sheet!doesn't fly

RyuDarragh (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Do a YT search for "JetPack Micro Turbine Project" and look at a practical *true* JetPack. It uses mircoturbine jet engines to provide thrust. And it should be able to do much better than this thing due to a much more efficient air mover. Fuel provides thrust as well as engine power.