|
Titanium1101 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Im disappointed in the gallardo, even though it won i expected it to beat the f430 from the get go. it only pulled on the top end
Titanium1101 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
WELL THEN HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THAT
paolotagliano (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
...rolling
pantelisf430 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
there was a comparison test between the 2 in an italian magazine called auto italia and the f430 was a lot better in all of the aspects they were comparing...0-62mph, braking dist 62-0mph, handling etc..
910127 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
LOL WAT KINDA START WAS THAT?
golf1diesel (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
this is the normal gallardo with 520 hp(not e-gear?) cause the egear 520 hp is even with 911 turbo..
ultimatexpka (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
take the passanger out of the car and race again
m5boarddotcom (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
An F430 is faster than a Gallardo SE
flamboasting (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
i'm disappointed in the gallardo, even though it won i expected it to beat the f430 from the get go. it only pulled on the top end
baadsha88 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Ferrari F430 has a better accleration but in the long run it can't keep up with the Gallardo SE |
