|
honchunfung (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
CatRem: Kempff is definitely for Beethoven. I am pretty sure. But "Horowitz maybe for Mozart" is the most stupid comment i've ever seen on youtube. His Mozart sucks. His Suhubert wasn't the best either. He is for Chopin and Liszt and Russian composers generally.
red425 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
This piece best displays Kempff's extremely lyrical playing. The slower passages give him room for rubatic interpretation, at which he excels.
mynameisyibble (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I think Kempff is the only pianist we have recordings of that really captures the urgency of this piece...
klausknulp (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
yes - agree 100%
drake41290 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
hell no BEETHOVEN is
CatRem (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I think Kempf definitely for Beethoven, Horowitz maybe for Mozart, Schubert etc.
josemiguel95 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
LOL "Grandpa"!!!! hahahaha
americanblues05 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
What about McCartney, Lennon, Clapton? think about it
bandong1234567890 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
no..........horowitz is
klausknulp (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
wilhelm kempff probably had been the most musical player ever |
