|
TyatKU (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
uh no, sorry
forger42 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
"Oy, Hovind! We can't carbon date this. There's no *beeping* carbon in it!"Priceless :)
adolthitler (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
=You can not scientifically prove it let alone use your five senses to prove it.==The Bible has been proven time and time again=You prove yourself you just assert any ole thing any ole time. Lets cheer your crew Ted Haggard, and Ken Hovind, for moral upstandness. Once again proving christians can assert anything, without rhyme nor reason.
sth312 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I agree that carbon dating is completely useless. it has been proven inaccurate over and over. and yes i agree that people are "willingly ignorant"
sth312 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
You can not scientifically prove it let alone use your five senses to prove it. But yes calling Him to condemn someone would be in vain. The Bible has been proven time and time again thus proving the truth of the Bible which therefore proves the existence of God
carlindelco (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
the ruler and space thing didn't get through did it? We can only be certain of things that we create that are withen in our own time and space. the bones were buried x yrs ago. We are only guessing when we say that Carbon dating is accurate , in that we can not see any deflection along the time line that would/could distort the results. the mollusk proves my point, Carbon dating was ballyhooed and being an absolute and never notated with any possible exceptions until this study.
Potholer54debunks (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
"...the only thing we know for sure about quantification of a measurement is only contained in the realm of our own design..."In other words, the instruments that measure C-14 ratios are our own design. Yes, you're right, humans designed them. And they work just fine. As for dating techniques greater than 1 mya, please see my video =The Age of Our World Made Easy= on the Potholer54 channel.
adolthitler (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
It is under some circumstances accurate and scientists take care to only claim its accuracy when accurate. Scientists who dated molluscs with RCD before the resovoir effect was known will be trying to redate the molluscs with other more accurate methods.That is science for you, working with the best info at the time. As opposed to creationists working with the best guess of sheep herders 6000 years ago, despite evidence its wrong.
adolthitler (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Now have you noticed your creationist hero has not made any science himself?He has just misinterpreted a scientific study and propagandised it as truth?He is a con man of the highest order. He knows he is a liar, and goes ahead and lies to sell his god. His god that considers lying as a sin. The man is seriously delusional about his standing with his god.
adolthitler (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
=that's his decision which is what you will be experiencing soon lol=If he don't exist he dont condemn EVER.Idiot, it proves RCD molluscs in inaccurate. RCD vegetation still works a treat. Notice the fault is with marine shellfish most, less with other marine life. Less again with land life, ending with accurate with land vegetation. Scientists also use methods such as the strata stuff is found in. Also other isotope dating to verify dates to a higher degree certainty than just one method. |
