|
Tomtheflyboy (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
lolI so agree!
Spencermx (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I mean the jokes were orignal bud, this is youtube not a political debate, besides i'm canadian we just hunt with our guns anyways
skankuser (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
No it doesn't, because not only is it an attempt on the infringement of the Second Amendment, it would never account for people who reload themselves. Not to mention that not all ammunition is used for killing humans beings. Take for instance, .300 Win Mag or .416 Rigby. Most people who support these measures know little of firearms or what surrounds them.
necksnapper08 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
loooooooool!!!!
Scotty7617 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
That's right. They're not. Of course I'm sure that most police officers do want to protect people and prevent crime, but they have no legal obligation to do so.You can look up many court cases of police being absolved of responsibility for failing to respond to 911 calls, but Warren vs DC is probably the best example.
ranonx (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
"I believe you got my property"
Spencermx (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
this is really good orignal stuff
humphreys1992 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
someone mentioned him earlier
damarei (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Yeah, if men in power can't ban something due to that pesky "constitution", they should find underhanded ways to do it.
kingVlad514 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Well this clip appeared in his documentary "Bowling for Columbine". Still irrelevent though. |