|
tooberwoober (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Good presentation but the math you did to get back to the inauguration of our Constitution was totally random.
twinpeakbob (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Nice presentation JWC, i like it.
sarasmilesgl (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
this isnt news... this is bias liberal explanations of current events.its well put together, but honestly- if you want to be fair, show both sides of the story and dont be so left winged, let the viewer make a decision about the story, not be INFLUENCED to an opinion.
BuDaily (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Very clever, I'd love to see more. Great music!
jamiahadams (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Phenomenal! Loved the overlying theme of justice or lack thereof. Looking forward to more episodes-- where can I see it? Should post on Current TV too.
parker19822 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Great idea, but the news anchor is very borring and lacks charisma and speaking skills in general. Find someone with a better voice and this could be an amazing show. Hard to take some emo looking guy serious when it comes to the content of the video.
aikomellow (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Yes!!! Love it!! more!! would watch everyday too, also will you make it more international? Congrats hope you can get it toghether!
Jeruschka (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
news worth watching. Would love the link for everyday. Or at least a weekly wrap up. The anchor is fantastic and delivers with a perfect tone. Green screen effect with photos and video moves well. Nicely done GNN / Radar
seecraig (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
The correspondent seems little more than a news reader. It seems like a device which could otherwise be voice over. The difference between news reader a correspondent is that the correspondent provides personal insight, wisdom, analysis as well some personal involvement in developing the story. I want to get the sense the correspondent was on location at some point gathering video, interviews, writing for their on camera read about the information they've gathered first hand.
seecraig (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Seems more "documentary" than news. The presentation of information and its visual content is good. The analysis of information is good.BUT . . . There are no interviews/sound bites. Information presented shows good analysis but 1st hand accounts are very improtant and missing."Anchor/news reader" keyed over video throughout is a good concept. Gets away from the false importance of a set/desk. |
