Search:

bourse
futures
forex

bourse trading bourse cac40 dow jones jerome kerviel

Cheney '94: Invading Baghdad Would Create Quagmire C-SPAN

http://bourse-video.com
http://bourse-video.com http://bourse-video.com
http://bourse-video.com

Partagez cette video:
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Netvouz
  • RawSugar
  • Reddit
  • scuttle
  • Shadows
  • Simpy
  • Smarking
  • Spurl
  • TailRank
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb

In this interview from April 15th, 1994 Dick Cheney reveals the reasons why invading Baghdad and toppling Saddam Hussein's regime wouldn't be a great idea. He also stipulates that "not very many" American soldiers' lives were worth losing to take out Saddam during the Gulf War.========================== =============SOURCE: This clip was originally aired on C-SPAN3 [History] on the evening of Thursday, August 9th. http://c-span.org

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm
Author: grandtheftcountry

Length: 01:22
Rating: 4.75
Views: 1082897

Tags: Bush  Cheney  Dead  Dick  George  Gulf  House  Hussein  Invasion  Iran  Iraq  Kuwait  Saddam  Saudi  Soldiers  Syria  US  War  White  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

7247724669924 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Goto __SUCCESSPROOFPROFITS(.)COM__the best i have seen^
Paradox244 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Wow, what an insightful answer. This guy sounds smart. I bet he's just furious about this whole Iraq war debacle!
seany150 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Giggity
videogenre (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Kathleen Christison wrote about this in 2002 in an article entitled "A Rose by Another NameThe Bush Administrations Dual Loyalties" -- we placed it on our If Americans Knew website. This is a must-read. It was never a "war for oil it was always a war for Israel. And now the same groups are pushing for us to attack Iran...
mavrek47 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I love Obama's CABINET member picks so far. When BUSH was asked to pick his CABINET, he couldn't decide between Maple, Oak or Pine. Dumb-shit! ~Joe VoterObama ties with Ayers - 0 KILLED.Bush ties w/Iraq (after lies) - 4200+ KILLED.
Hereticbooks (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Saddam and Bin Laden are/were natural enemies. Each was a threat to the other, and each would have killed the other given the chance.
Hereticbooks (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
pmango...what the hell are you talking about? The entire world watched the Bush cronies sell the WMD story to the United Nations and the world...it's the REASON we invaded. None found. All their backpedaling and changing of agenda didn't change the fact...there were NO WMD's in Iraq when we invaded, and there haven't been for years. Let's not forget that they NEVER would have had them, had the U.S. not SUPPLIED them in the first place.
ilikeicecreamandcake (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
don't argue with pmango, he's a dumbfuck. he can't comprehend logically stuff right before his eyes.
ninetygnyc (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
pmango1000. "9-11 happened does that answer your question" i do realize 9-11 happened, i went to pace university, i was one block away when the towers fell. saddam using wmd's against the kurds,,,ok, are you willing to die because of that as an american, cause im not. and what is your definition of a terrorist? what terrorist did saddam fund? its been proven that saddam couldnt stand al qaeda.
pmango1000 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
ninetygnyc:9-11 happened does that answer your question? Whether Saddam played a part in 9-11 or not is not the debate...the debate is after a 9-11, is it wise to let Saddam stay in power since he has funded terrorists before, he was known to work with terrorists, and he used WMD on his own people.

bourse-video.com (beta) © 2007 All Rights Reserved.

Jeux