94jerry2 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

do u haev MSN messenger? go2 my profile and msg my ID!I enjoy this video =) it makes me really horny!! hK

wellingtonian (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Yeah! I'm all for sending all you family members of legal fighting age to their deaths and systematically ending your entire lineage.

zandafar (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Because Lawson stands for something. Cho is all about telling people why he could beat his opponent. Lawson is all about the issues facing the voters.

dude58677 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

So if Lawson is such a weak candidate as Cho claims, why did BJ Lawson crush him in the primaries?

tokyoscramble (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

It did.

NSResponder (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

I think Cho should be explaining why he *isn't* a Ron Paul Republican. Is he for the war? Is he for funny money? Is he for the abolition of our civil rights?-jcr

PizzaGod (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

wow, I you were running in my district, I would be out campaigning for you.I would support a Ron Paul Jr.I hope that comment comes back and bites him in the ass.

tracysaboe (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Actually a Ron Paul Republican is the only Republican that can get the cross-over anti-war democrat vote.Tracy

alnewberry (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

"Vote for me, I'll violate your civil rights. So vote for Lawson."

BrettCelinski (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Do Republicans down there really starve for federal aid and government like this bozo thinks they do?I'm from PA so what do I know... right? Kind of ironic that some people would think that... believing that each state is different (not bad), but then turning around and supporting bozos like this who push spending and pander to DC!I hope you guys elect Lawson! Lawson, Sabrin, Flake... let's get these guys in office! Ron Paul can easily do it with 70%... I don't see why they can't either!